linux-kernel - [PATCH] fat: Expand a slightly out-of-date comment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180927150046.11538-1-mihir@cs.utexas.edu>
Date:   Thu, 27 Sep 2018 10:00:46 -0500
From:   Mihir Mehta <mihir@...utexas.edu>
To:     hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mihir Mehta <mihir@...utexas.edu>
Subject: [PATCH] fat: Expand a slightly out-of-date comment

The file namei.c seems to have been renamed to namei_msdos.c, so I
decided to update the comment with the correct name, and expand it a bit
to tell the reader what to look for.
---
 fs/fat/dir.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c
index b833ffe..d954e18 100644
--- a/fs/fat/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fat/dir.c
@@ -368,7 +368,8 @@ static int fat_parse_short(struct super_block *sb,
 	}
 
 	memcpy(work, de->name, sizeof(work));
-	/* see namei.c, msdos_format_name */
+	/* For an explanation of the special treatment of 0x05 in
+	   filenames, see msdos_format_name in namei_msdos.c */
 	if (work[0] == 0x05)
 		work[0] = 0xE5;
 
-- 
2.7.4