linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] regulator/mfd: Support ROHM BD71847 power management IC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 10:14:37 +0300
From:   Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, lgirdwood@...il.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        mazziesaccount@...il.com, heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com,
        mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] regulator/mfd: Support ROHM BD71847 power
 management IC

On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:52:58AM -0700, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:02:41AM -0700, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 21 Sep 2018, Mark Brown wrote:
> > 
> > > > This looks OK to me - Lee, the patch is almost entirely a regulator one,
> > > > are you OK with me applying it?
> > 
> > > The diff in rohm-bd718x7.h does not look significant.
> > 
> > > You can apply it so long as you provide me with a PR in order to avoid
> > > any potential merge conflicts.  Especially as Linus is out for this
> > > release.
> > 
> > Great, thanks.  There's also the MFD DT bindings and another patch later
> > on with Acked-for-MFD tags on them, should I convert the tags to acks,
> > apply those as well and include them in the pull request?
> 
> Please.

I was just wondering if I could do something to help get this patch
series applied? Mark, have you had the time to take a look on pickable
ranges addition yet? Should I do some rebasing/resending? Are you giving
me a nudge if I can do something?

Br,
	Matti Vaittinen