linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] regulator/mfd: Support ROHM BD71847 power management IC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180928133046.GL20825@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:30:46 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, lgirdwood@...il.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
        mazziesaccount@...il.com, heikki.haikola@...rohmeurope.com,
        mikko.mutanen@...rohmeurope.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] regulator/mfd: Support ROHM BD71847 power
 management IC

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 10:14:37AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:

> I was just wondering if I could do something to help get this patch
> series applied? Mark, have you had the time to take a look on pickable
> ranges addition yet? Should I do some rebasing/resending? Are you giving
> me a nudge if I can do something?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.
Sending content free pings just adds to the mail volume (if they are
seen at all) and if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the
patches anyway so resending with any comments addressed is generally a 
much better approach.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)