[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180928132607.GK20825@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 14:26:07 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...tlin.com>
Cc: Chuanhua Han <chuanhua.han@....com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"eha@...f.com" <eha@...f.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: spi-mem: Add the spi_set_xfer_bpw function
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 09:18:33AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> I might be wrong, but that's not my understanding of ->bits_per_word.
> To me, it's something that you can use when your *device* (not
> controller) expects non-byte aligned words [1]. The spi-mem protocol is
Yes, bits per word is a device setting. SPI devices can have control
protocols that have words larger than a byte with a fixed byte order,
many controllers do the required byte swapping.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists