[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153815024975.119890.6463829001501352147@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 08:57:29 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: fix OF child-node lookup
Quoting Tero Kristo (2018-09-20 00:11:08)
> On 31/08/18 00:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Johan Hovold (2018-08-22 02:03:19)
> >> Fix child-node lookup which by using the wrong OF helper was searching
> >> the whole tree depth-first, something which could end up matching an
> >> unrelated node.
> >>
> >> Also fix the related node-reference leaks.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 5b385a45e001 ("clk: ti: add support for clkctrl aliases")
> >> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
> >> ---
> >
> > Applied to clk-next
> >
>
> Stephen, this patch causes a merge conflict with some of the code I am
> planning to send a pull-req against (the clkctrl work series:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/list/?series=13841)
>
> Would it be possible to drop this from clk-next, and for me to
> pick-it-up via my own branch? I can get this setup either today or tomorrow.
>
> Alternatively I need an immutable branch against which I can work.
>
clk-ti-of-node is immutable. You can base on top of that and send a PR.
Does that work for you?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists