[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a81ed51-765d-e0b5-0baa-67774d536e1d@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:03:06 +0300
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: ti: fix OF child-node lookup
On 28/09/18 18:57, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Tero Kristo (2018-09-20 00:11:08)
>> On 31/08/18 00:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Johan Hovold (2018-08-22 02:03:19)
>>>> Fix child-node lookup which by using the wrong OF helper was searching
>>>> the whole tree depth-first, something which could end up matching an
>>>> unrelated node.
>>>>
>>>> Also fix the related node-reference leaks.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 5b385a45e001 ("clk: ti: add support for clkctrl aliases")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Applied to clk-next
>>>
>>
>> Stephen, this patch causes a merge conflict with some of the code I am
>> planning to send a pull-req against (the clkctrl work series:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-clk/list/?series=13841)
>>
>> Would it be possible to drop this from clk-next, and for me to
>> pick-it-up via my own branch? I can get this setup either today or tomorrow.
>>
>> Alternatively I need an immutable branch against which I can work.
>>
>
> clk-ti-of-node is immutable. You can base on top of that and send a PR.
> Does that work for you?
That should work just fine for me.
I'll work on top of this and send a pull-req, thanks.
-Tero
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists