linux-kernel - [PATCH net-next] selftests/tls: Fix recv(MSG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20180928161808.10363-1-vakul.garg@nxp.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 Sep 2018 21:48:08 +0530
From:   Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, davejwatson@...com, davem@...emloft.net,
        doronrk@...com, Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] selftests/tls: Fix recv(MSG_PEEK) & splice() test cases

TLS test cases splice_from_pipe, send_and_splice &
recv_peek_multiple_records expect to receive a given nummber of bytes
and then compare them against the number of bytes which were sent.
Therefore, system call recv() must not return before receiving the
requested number of bytes, otherwise the subsequent memcmp() fails.
This patch passes MSG_WAITALL flag to recv() so that it does not return
prematurely before requested number of bytes are copied to receive
buffer.

Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@....com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
index 11d54c36ae49..fac68d710f35 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ TEST_F(tls, splice_from_pipe)
 	ASSERT_GE(pipe(p), 0);
 	EXPECT_GE(write(p[1], mem_send, send_len), 0);
 	EXPECT_GE(splice(p[0], NULL, self->fd, NULL, send_len, 0), 0);
-	EXPECT_GE(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, 0), 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, MSG_WAITALL), send_len);
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(mem_send, mem_recv, send_len), 0);
 }
 
@@ -322,13 +322,13 @@ TEST_F(tls, send_and_splice)
 
 	ASSERT_GE(pipe(p), 0);
 	EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, test_str, send_len2, 0), send_len2);
-	EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len2, 0), -1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len2, MSG_WAITALL), send_len2);
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str, buf, send_len2), 0);
 
 	EXPECT_GE(write(p[1], mem_send, send_len), send_len);
 	EXPECT_GE(splice(p[0], NULL, self->fd, NULL, send_len, 0), send_len);
 
-	EXPECT_GE(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, 0), 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, MSG_WAITALL), send_len);
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(mem_send, mem_recv, send_len), 0);
 }
 
@@ -516,17 +516,17 @@ TEST_F(tls, recv_peek_multiple_records)
 	len = strlen(test_str_second) + 1;
 	EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, test_str_second, len, 0), len);
 
-	len = sizeof(buf);
+	len = strlen(test_str_first);
 	memset(buf, 0, len);
-	EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_PEEK), -1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL), len);
 
 	/* MSG_PEEK can only peek into the current record. */
-	len = strlen(test_str_first) + 1;
+	len = strlen(test_str_first);
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str_first, buf, len), 0);
 
-	len = sizeof(buf);
+	len = strlen(test_str) + 1;
 	memset(buf, 0, len);
-	EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, 0), -1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_WAITALL), len);
 
 	/* Non-MSG_PEEK will advance strparser (and therefore record)
 	 * however.
@@ -543,9 +543,9 @@ TEST_F(tls, recv_peek_multiple_records)
 	len = strlen(test_str_second) + 1;
 	EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, test_str_second, len, 0), len);
 
-	len = sizeof(buf);
+	len = strlen(test_str) + 1;
 	memset(buf, 0, len);
-	EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_PEEK), -1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL), len);
 
 	len = strlen(test_str) + 1;
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str, buf, len), 0);
-- 
2.13.6