[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+L+vvfh_Co6FXkyhBbwct16t8sWsw3J7hmXP4uaJaaPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:19:07 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Convert to using %pOFn instead of device_node.name
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 12:02 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:52:39PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node,
> > convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier.
> >
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/perf/arm_pmu_platform.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> Cheers, I can queue this up for 4.20. Let me know if you'd rather take it
> along with the name pointer removal instead.
I assumed you were going to take this since I didn't say otherwise,
but looks like it is not in linux-next. Please take thru your tree.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists