linux-kernel - linux-next: commits in the cisco tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 30 Sep 2018 11:24:19 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: commits in the cisco tree

Hi Daniel,

I noticed that you have added some commits to the cisco tree today.  Just a couple of comments:

Fristly, commits

  734245aec283 ("This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin command line."

and

  b17f223f16f2 ("This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin command line.")

are identical (though in different branches).

Secondly, commits

  2c070709ea75 ("his updates the x86 code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE")
  a5c4647c26da ("This updates the powerpc code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE")

have no Acked-by or Reviewed-by from the repspective architecture
maintainers/developers.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped