linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: commits in the cisco tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181001144257.GA13523@fifo99.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:42:57 -0700
From:   dwalker@...o99.com
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: commits in the cisco tree

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 11:24:19AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> I noticed that you have added some commits to the cisco tree today.  Just a couple of comments:
> 
> Fristly, commits
> 
>   734245aec283 ("This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin command line."
> 
> and
> 
>   b17f223f16f2 ("This code allows architectures to use a generic builtin command line.")
> 
> are identical (though in different branches).
> 
> Secondly, commits
> 
>   2c070709ea75 ("his updates the x86 code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE")
>   a5c4647c26da ("This updates the powerpc code to use the CONFIG_GENERIC_CMDLINE")
> 
> have no Acked-by or Reviewed-by from the repspective architecture
> maintainers/developers.

Is this just an alert , or are you not merging for these reasons ?

Daniel