linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] sched/topology: Reference the Energy Model of CPUs when available

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181002131657.7lysubukna4tkjly@queper01-lin>
Date:   Tue, 2 Oct 2018 14:16:59 +0100
From:   Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
        morten.rasmussen@....com, chris.redpath@....com,
        patrick.bellasi@....com, valentin.schneider@....com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, thara.gopinath@...aro.org,
        viresh.kumar@...aro.org, tkjos@...gle.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        smuckle@...gle.com, adharmap@...eaurora.org,
        skannan@...eaurora.org, pkondeti@...eaurora.org,
        juri.lelli@...hat.com, edubezval@...il.com,
        srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, currojerez@...eup.net,
        javi.merino@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] sched/topology: Reference the Energy Model of
 CPUs when available

On Tuesday 02 Oct 2018 at 14:36:17 (+0200), Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 10:13:01AM +0100, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > +struct perf_domain {
> > +	struct em_perf_domain *obj;
> > +	struct perf_domain *next;
> > +	struct rcu_head rcu;
> > +};
> 
> Maybe s/obj/em_pd/ or something like that? @obj is so very opaque.

I wanted to avoid calling it just 'pd' since that could be confusing. So
anything different than that is fine by me. I don't have a better
suggestion than 'em_pd', so I'd say let's stick with that for now.

Thanks,
Quentin