lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181001222257.45e4fd59@coco.lan>
Date:   Mon, 1 Oct 2018 22:22:57 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Justin Ernst <justin.ernst@....com>, russ.anderson@....com,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Aristeu Rozanski Filho <arozansk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC: Don't add devices under /sys/bus/edac

Em Mon, 1 Oct 2018 15:43:13 -0700
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com> escreveu:

> Nobody(*) uses them.  Dropping this will allow us to make the total
> number of memory controllers configurable (as we won't have to
> worry about duplicated device names under this directory).
> 
> (*) https://marc.info/?l=linux-edac&m=153809709903987&w=2
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> ---
> 
> Boris: Apply this, then your earlier patch to get rid of the
> hard coded limit on the number of memory controllers:
>   https://marc.info/?l=linux-edac&m=153797567628947&w=2
> the combination works on my 4 socket machine. Perhaps HPE
> can test on their superdome.
> 

For both this and the referred patch:

Acked-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>

>  drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> index 20374b8248f0..4c1bee59c2e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/edac_mc_sysfs.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,6 @@ static int edac_create_csrow_object(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
>  				    struct csrow_info *csrow, int index)
>  {
>  	csrow->dev.type = &csrow_attr_type;
> -	csrow->dev.bus = mci->bus;
>  	csrow->dev.groups = csrow_dev_groups;
>  	device_initialize(&csrow->dev);
>  	csrow->dev.parent = &mci->dev;
> @@ -636,7 +635,6 @@ static int edac_create_dimm_object(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
>  	dimm->mci = mci;
>  
>  	dimm->dev.type = &dimm_attr_type;
> -	dimm->dev.bus = mci->bus;
>  	device_initialize(&dimm->dev);
>  
>  	dimm->dev.parent = &mci->dev;
> @@ -940,7 +938,6 @@ int edac_create_sysfs_mci_device(struct mem_ctl_info *mci,
>  	device_initialize(&mci->dev);
>  
>  	mci->dev.parent = mci_pdev;
> -	mci->dev.bus = mci->bus;
>  	mci->dev.groups = groups;
>  	dev_set_name(&mci->dev, "mc%d", mci->mc_idx);
>  	dev_set_drvdata(&mci->dev, mci);



Thanks,
Mauro

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ