[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181003053902.6910-13-ldr709@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:38:58 -0700
From: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/16] locking/mutex: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
---
kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
index 9aa713629387..771d4ca96dda 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex-debug.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ void debug_mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
void debug_mutex_wake_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
{
- SMP_DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&lock->wait_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(list_empty(&lock->wait_list));
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(waiter->magic != waiter);
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(list_empty(&waiter->list));
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ void debug_mutex_free_waiter(struct mutex_waiter *waiter)
void debug_mutex_add_waiter(struct mutex *lock, struct mutex_waiter *waiter,
struct task_struct *task)
{
- SMP_DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&lock->wait_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&lock->wait_lock);
/* Mark the current thread as blocked on the lock: */
task->blocked_on = waiter;
--
2.19.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists