[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181003053902.6910-12-ldr709@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:38:57 -0700
From: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 11/16] futex: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>
---
kernel/futex.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index 11fc3bb456d6..3e2de8fc1891 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1365,9 +1365,9 @@ static void __unqueue_futex(struct futex_q *q)
{
struct futex_hash_bucket *hb;
- if (WARN_ON_SMP(!q->lock_ptr || !spin_is_locked(q->lock_ptr))
- || WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list)))
+ if (WARN_ON_SMP(!q->lock_ptr) || WARN_ON(plist_node_empty(&q->list)))
return;
+ lockdep_assert_held(q->lock_ptr);
hb = container_of(q->lock_ptr, struct futex_hash_bucket, lock);
plist_del(&q->list, &hb->chain);
--
2.19.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists