[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181003053902.6910-11-ldr709@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:38:56 -0700
From: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 10/16] userfaultfd: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
---
fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/userfaultfd.c b/fs/userfaultfd.c
index bfa0ec69f924..a20244ff0027 100644
--- a/fs/userfaultfd.c
+++ b/fs/userfaultfd.c
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ static inline struct userfaultfd_wait_queue *find_userfault_in(
wait_queue_entry_t *wq;
struct userfaultfd_wait_queue *uwq;
- VM_BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&wqh->lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&wqh->lock);
uwq = NULL;
if (!waitqueue_active(wqh))
--
2.19.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists