[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181003154101.0b46956d@roar.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 15:41:01 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 5/7] powerpc: 'current_set' is now a table of
task_struct pointers
On Mon, 1 Oct 2018 12:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr> wrote:
> The table of pointers 'current_set' has been used for retrieving
> the stack and current. They used to be thread_info pointers as
> they were pointing to the stack and current was taken from the
> 'task' field of the thread_info.
>
> Now, the pointers of 'current_set' table are now both pointers
> to task_struct and pointers to thread_info.
>
> As they are used to get current, and the stack pointer is
> retrieved from current's stack field, this patch changes
> their type to task_struct, and renames secondary_ti to
> secondary_current.
I'm not sure if current_set is actually needed is it? Because
64-bit already initializes paca->ksave / PACAKSAVE. That might
be a cleanup to do after your series.
Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists