[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181003053902.6910-6-ldr709@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2018 22:38:51 -0700
From: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>,
Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 05/16] igbvf: Replace spin_is_locked() with lockdep
lockdep_assert_held() is better suited to checking locking requirements,
since it won't get confused when someone else holds the lock. This is
also a step towards possibly removing spin_is_locked().
Signed-off-by: Lance Roy <ldr709@...il.com>
Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c
index 163e5838f7c2..a3cd7ac48d4b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/mbx.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static s32 e1000_write_mbx_vf(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size)
s32 err;
u16 i;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!spin_is_locked(&hw->mbx_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&hw->mbx_lock);
/* lock the mailbox to prevent pf/vf race condition */
err = e1000_obtain_mbx_lock_vf(hw);
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static s32 e1000_read_mbx_vf(struct e1000_hw *hw, u32 *msg, u16 size)
s32 err;
u16 i;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!spin_is_locked(&hw->mbx_lock));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&hw->mbx_lock);
/* lock the mailbox to prevent pf/vf race condition */
err = e1000_obtain_mbx_lock_vf(hw);
--
2.19.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists