linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] block: BFQ default for single queue devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdaeYU+Crr75T49WftyOHqCrsyBLBPDBBsJF-RCjmAQEdw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 08:53:37 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
        Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>, aherrmann@...e.com
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, mgorman@...e.com,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com, oleksandr@...alenko.name,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: BFQ default for single queue devices

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 8:29 AM Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org> wrote:

> So, I do understand your need for conservativeness, but, after so much
> evidence on single-queue devices, and so many years! :), what's the
> point in keeping Linux worse for virtually everybody, by default?

I understand if we need to ease things in as well, I don't intend this
change for the current merge window or anything, since v4.19
will notably have this patch:

commit d5038a13eca72fb216c07eb717169092e92284f1
Author: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
Date:   Wed Jul 4 10:53:56 2018 +0200

    scsi: core: switch to scsi-mq by default

    It has been more than one year since we tried to change the default from
    legacy to multi queue in SCSI with commit c279bd9e406 ("scsi: default to
    scsi-mq"). But due to issues with suspend/resume and performance problems
    it had been reverted again with commit cbe7dfa26eee ("Revert "scsi: default
    to scsi-mq"").

    In the meantime there have been a substantial amount of performance
    improvements and suspend/resume got fixed as well, thus we can re-enable
    scsi-mq without a significant performance penalty.

    Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>
    Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
    Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
    Acked-by: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
    Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>

I guess that patch can be a bit scary by itself. But IIUC it all went
fine this time!

But hey, if that works, that means $SUBJECT patch will enable BFQ on all
libata devices and any SCSI that is single queue as well, not just
"obscure" stuff like MMC/SD and UBI, and that is
indeed a massive crowd of legacy devices. But we're talking
v4.21 here.

Johannes, you might be interested in $SUBJECT patch.
It'd be nice to hear what SUSE people have to add, since they
are pretty proactive in this area.

Yours,
Linus Walleij