[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1538550325.14984.108.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2018 10:05:25 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@...aro.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Andreas Herrmann <aherrmann@...e.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.com>,
Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Paolo Valente' via bfq-iosched
<bfq-iosched@...glegroups.com>,
Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: BFQ default for single queue devices
On Wed, 2018-10-03 at 08:29 +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> So, I do understand your need for conservativeness, but, after so much
> evidence on single-queue devices, and so many years! :), what's the
> point in keeping Linux worse for virtually everybody, by default?
Sounds like what we just need a mechanism for the device (ubi block in
this case) to select the I/O scheduler. I doubt enhancing the default
scheduler selection logic in 'elevator.c' is the right answer. Just
give the driver authority to override the defaults.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists