linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 08/27] irqchip/gic: Unify GIC priority definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb1b6e2a-cffc-adc7-d0ff-2ed21919ea80@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:24:00 +0100
From:   Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:     Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@...aro.org,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, mark.rutland@....com,
        christoffer.dall@....com, james.morse@....com,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/27] irqchip/gic: Unify GIC priority definitions

On 28/08/18 16:51, Julien Thierry wrote:
> LPIs use the same priority value as other GIC interrupts.
> 
> Make the GIC default priority definition visible to ITS implementation
> and use this same definition for LPI priorities.
> 
> Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@....com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
> ---
>   drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c       | 2 +-
>   include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic-common.h | 6 ++++++
>   include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h        | 5 -----
>   3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

I've cherry-picked this for 4.20, as this is a good cleanup.

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...