linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Remove LM3697

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181003130154.GA20418@amd>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 15:01:54 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, jacek.anaszewski@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-leds@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Remove LM3697

On Wed 2018-10-03 07:24:23, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Hello
> 
> On 10/02/2018 02:28 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Fri 2018-09-28 13:29:47, Dan Murphy wrote:
> >> Remove support for the LM3697 LED device
> >> from the ti-lmu.  The LM3697 will be supported
> >> via a stand alone LED driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> > 
> > NAK, for reasons I explained before. Please add it to the patch so
> > that it does not get applied by mistake. Ouch and AFAICT Rob was not
> > happy with this either.
> > 
> > Yes, you are creating new drivers, ok; but that does _not_ mean you
> > should create new binding.
> 
> I am copying my comment here on the review of this original binding for
> records
> 
> I found the review or at least the reference for the ti-lmu.txt binding.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/764180/
> 
> Does not appear that the binding was sent to the device tree mail list.
> (Maybe that email list did not exist in Feb 2017).

Quick google shows:

https://lwn.net/Articles/666023/

Now can we stop this nonsense? If there is a problem with the binding,
submit patches to fix the problem.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)