lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9oAa+Ezqy639_wSKsUDW4vgSrkbJUVd1O8Jcbo3CN4WKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:08:47 +0200
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        Andy Polyakov <appro@...nssl.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Samuel Neves <sneves@....uc.pt>,
        Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 11/23] zinc: import Andy Polyakov's Poly1305
 ARM and ARM64 implementations

Hi Ard,

On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:58 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> >> it has changed. This awkward commit splitting has been requested for the
> >> ARM[64] implementations in particular.
> >>
>
> "This awkward commit splitting"

Awkward in the sense that only those two commits are doing it, whereas
the rest of the series is not. Not awkward in any other sense that you
seemed to have divined based on your oversized punctuation below.
Fortunately, at your suggestion for v7, I've now done the splitting
for all of the other places, and so I the comment in the dev tree a
few days ago, since it's now done consistently across the patchset.

>
> Seriously?!?
>
> So you really think it is fine to import huge chunks of code like this
> from other projects without keeping track of the local changes?

As explained above, that's not what I meant at all.

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ