[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHmME9rWkLT=92QVhbYZd1oee5wYtVRnYu0BGHkGn3bXjN-OxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 16:12:04 +0200
From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 23/23] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel
Hi Ard,
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 1:15 PM Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org> wrote:
> > +config WIREGUARD
> > + tristate "WireGuard secure network tunnel"
> > + depends on NET && INET
>
> I think you need to add IPV6 here
Nope. Like much of the net tree, WireGuard can function on ipv6-less
kernels. If you do find something in WireGuard isn't working in a
v6-less configuration, I consider that to be a bug that needs fixing.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists