linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle/drivers/menu: Remove get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2531993.xoN9vA4MB0@aspire.rjw.lan>
Date:   Thu, 04 Oct 2018 11:39:14 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
        Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
        Ramesh Thomas <ramesh.thomas@...el.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] cpuidle/drivers/menu: Remove get_loadavg in the performance multiplier

On Thursday, October 4, 2018 11:36:44 AM CEST Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:47:04AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > > The comment is irrelevant as the remaining function is used for
> > > statistics in addition to the perf multiplier. It does exactly what the
> > > function name is.
> > 
> > Which is my point.  It shouldn't be dropped entirely, but updated IMO.
> 
> But the function name isn't the problem.. the problem that any use of
> the number is fundamentally broken.
> 

We're in violent agreement here. :-)

I just wanted to say that the comment was still relevant at least with
respect to this function, but the patch was removing the comment
entirely.