linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: Use more standard GPIO binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181004105031.GD6412@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 4 Oct 2018 11:50:31 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>, robh@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: Use more standard GPIO binding

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:

>  Optional properties:
> -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control

Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a standards
conforming property or would best practice be to call it enable-gpios or
something?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)