linux-kernel - Re: x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address (ptrval)/0xc00a0000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181004105443.GH1864@zn.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 4 Oct 2018 12:54:43 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
Cc:     Jörg Rödel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        x86@...nel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address (ptrval)/0xc00a0000

On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:59:18AM +0200, Paul Menzel wrote:
> I meant just the test you did.

https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181003212255.GB28361@zn.tnic

> The SSD is also used in the Lenovo X60 and T60, which are
> 32-bit systems.

And what exactly is the problem when you access it on a 64-bit OS?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.