[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181004125331.GR4088@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 14:53:31 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: m41t80: fix fall-through annotation
Hi,
On 04/10/2018 14:35:28+0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Replace "Fall" with a proper "Fall through" annotation.
>
> This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough
>
Can we agree that this is absolutely not a fix? I don't wan't to have
that needlessly backport on gazillion stable kernel.
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373875 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
> index ad03e2f..a3fb235 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-m41t80.c
> @@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static int wdt_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> return -EINVAL;
> wdt_margin = new_margin;
> wdt_ping();
> - /* Fall */
> + /* Fall through */
> case WDIOC_GETTIMEOUT:
> return put_user(wdt_margin, (int __user *)arg);
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists