[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7105b78f-584a-f380-2979-ba04aee10c91@embeddedor.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2018 15:01:29 +0200
From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: m41t80: fix fall-through annotation
On 10/4/18 2:53 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/10/2018 14:35:28+0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> Replace "Fall" with a proper "Fall through" annotation.
>>
>> This fix is part of the ongoing efforts to enabling
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough
>>
>
> Can we agree that this is absolutely not a fix? I don't wan't to have
> that needlessly backport on gazillion stable kernel.
>
Well, as clearly the intention of the developer was to add a fall-through
comment, but it was incomplete, I considered this a fix. But, I see your
point and I agree. There is not need for this to be applied to stable trees.
I will change the subject.
Thanks
--
Gustavo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists