linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: meson-mx-sdio: mark expected switch fall-through

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 5 Oct 2018 23:10:12 +0200
From:   Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:     gustavo@...eddedor.com
Cc:     ulf.hansson@...aro.org, carlo@...one.org, khilman@...libre.com,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: meson-mx-sdio: mark expected switch fall-through

On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 12:15 PM Gustavo A. R. Silva
<gustavo@...eddedor.com> wrote:
>
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "fall-through:"
> comment with a proper "fall through", which is what GCC is
> expecting to find.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1373880 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>

thank you for taking care of this!


Regards
Martin