[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a2Yzv1ThTZLp5boydi1_poi_V7RbSF3JZ4KG41GEjF6RA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:43:20 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Cc: gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devang.panchal@...tnautics.com,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] eeprom: at25: remove unneeded 'at25_remove'
On Fri, Oct 5, 2018 at 8:08 AM YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com> wrote:
>
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c: In function 'at25_remove':
> drivers/misc/eeprom/at25.c:384:20: warning:
> variable 'at25' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> Since commit 96d08fb43e30 ("eeprom: at25: use devm_nvmem_register()"),
> at25_remove is do nothing, so can be removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
I had to double-check that removing the remove callback doesn't
result in a device that you cannot remove, but it is in fact supported, so
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists