linux-kernel - Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181008163243.72825e05@coco.lan>
Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 16:32:43 -0300
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ksummit <ksummit-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH 1/2] code-of-conduct: Fix the
 ambiguity about collecting email addresses

Em Mon, 8 Oct 2018 09:37:59 +1000
Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com> escreveu:

> On Mon, 8 Oct 2018 at 08:56, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 08:25:35AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> >  
> > > This isn't a legally binding license or anything, but departing from
> > > the upstream wording makes it tricker to merge new upstream versions
> > > if they are considered appropriate.  
> >
> > Nicely done, that - gotta love the passive voice use.  Considered appropriate
> > *by* *whom*?  
> 
> Good question, do we have a CoC maintainer? Is Linus it, Greg, TAB?
> 
> Maybe step one is to find the person who can make changes to the
> kernel CoC (has anyone checked if Linus or Greg will merge this).

If we add it to the MAINTAINERS file (with makes perfect sense to me),
I would like to have a R: entry there, in order to be notified when
people propose changes to it. My personal understanding is that it may 
have legal value under the legislation of the Country I live, and I'd
like to understand changes there that might affect my workflow.

Thanks,
Mauro