[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181008151258.GI18757@krava>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 17:12:58 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/3]: perf util: map data buffer for preserving
collected data
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 05:43:38PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 08.10.2018 15:38, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:03:18PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> <SNIP>
> >>
> >> Well, let's go with stub functions design as opposite to pure
> >> conditional compilation. However this may, probably, result in
> >> unintended Perf tool binary size growth, even if NO_AIO is
> >> defined during compilation.
> >
> > hum, empty functions are be optimized out
>
> Yes, but there will be references to stubs in else branch of
> record__mmap_read_evlist() so I am not sure that *all* compilers
> are smart enough to recognize and still optimize it out.
well, kernel is doing that and it seem to be fine,
so I wouldn't worry about it
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists