[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e999d83f-5a2d-6e59-bc46-25b3516ed425@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:21:48 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 3/3]: perf record: extend trace writing to multi AIO
Hi,
On 08.10.2018 15:45, Jiri Olsa wrote:
<SNIP>
>
> 'perf record --aio-cblocks=N' could imply '--aio',
>
> I'd like to have simple/intuitive way to enable that,
> without studing the meaning of the cblocks argument
>
> # perf record --aio ...
>
> means that I'm storing data via async writes,
> and using some reasonable default for cblocks
Semantically, --aio is equal to --aio-cblocks=default, as you said.
So, options duplication could be avoided by having some parsing
callback using OPT_CALLBACK().
>
> and later on we'd add 'perf record --threads'
> allowing threads based writers ;-)
Oh, I see. Cool.
Thanks,
Alexey
>
> jirka
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists