[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21c82730-d54b-46ee-6392-be633014930d@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2018 18:38:35 +0300
From: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/3]: perf util: map data buffer for preserving
collected data
Hi,
On 08.10.2018 18:12, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 05:43:38PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 08.10.2018 15:38, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 03:03:18PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
>> <SNIP>
>>>>
>>>> Well, let's go with stub functions design as opposite to pure
>>>> conditional compilation. However this may, probably, result in
>>>> unintended Perf tool binary size growth, even if NO_AIO is
>>>> defined during compilation.
>>>
>>> hum, empty functions are be optimized out
>>
>> Yes, but there will be references to stubs in else branch of
>> record__mmap_read_evlist() so I am not sure that *all* compilers
>> are smart enough to recognize and still optimize it out.
>
> well, kernel is doing that and it seem to be fine,
> so I wouldn't worry about it
Then, Ok. Good to know.
Thanks,
Alexey
>
> jirka
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists