linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] proc: Don't retain negative dentries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b10ac74f-1e70-aa4d-7aec-65cbea0a9d83@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 8 Oct 2018 19:02:09 +0200
From:   Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To:     Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] proc: Don't retain negative dentries

Hello,

On 10/8/18 6:55 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> 
> What the hell does that have to do with negative dentries anywhere???

It's possible that this needs fixing at another place. I don't know,
but this seems to work for me, that's why I prefixed with RFC.

> NAK.  Rationale makes no sense _and_ the patch has nothing to do
> with claimed rationale.

Please CC me when this gets fixed properly. I am curious. :-)


Cheers
Ahmad