linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Add SPI driver support for GENI based QUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <153910152600.119890.14820584405992384926@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 09 Oct 2018 09:12:06 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     alokc@...eaurora.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-spi <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Girish Mahadevan <girishm@...eaurora.org>,
        Dilip Kota <dkota@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Add SPI driver support for GENI based
 QUP

Quoting Doug Anderson (2018-10-08 16:52:36)
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 4:43 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
> > > +       mas->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> > > +       if (mas->irq < 0) {
> > > +               ret = mas->irq;
> > > +               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Err getting IRQ %d\n", ret);
> > > +               goto spi_geni_probe_runtime_disable;
> > > +       }
> >
> > Nitpick: If you got the irq earlier before allocating anything then nothing has
> > to be put on failure path.
> 
> I think this might have been in response to previous feedback from you
> suggesting that we should get the irq as late as possible.  Ah, here
> ya go:
> 
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/153780767551.119890.9339380838620508307@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com

Yes I suggested we register for the irq as last as possible, but I
didn't suggest calling platform_get_irq() this late. It could be called
earlier so that if there isn't any irq then nothing to do besides return
failure.