[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <966cae81-c3f6-1d38-5721-97dc317a3fde@tomt.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 05:21:31 +0200
From: Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.18 000/168] 4.18.13-stable review
On 08. okt. 2018 20:29, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.18.13 release.
> There are 168 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
CC [M] net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.o
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_icmp.c:373:3: error: ‘const struct
nf_conntrack_l4proto’ has no member named ‘ctnl_timeout’; did you mean
‘get_timeouts’?
.ctnl_timeout = {
^~~~~~~~~~~~
get_timeouts
The problematic patch is:>
netfilter-conntrack-timeout-interface-depend-on-config_nf_conntrack_timeout.patch
The stuff the commit message talks about seems like it was added in
4.19-rc1, so this should not go into stable.
Kernel builds fine with this one patch reverted.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists