[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181009142145.210622b2@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2018 14:21:44 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the s290 tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/s390/Kconfig
between commit:
819eafaa7b58 ("s390/kasan: add initialization code and enable it")
from the s290 tree and commit:
13ddb52c165b ("s390/jump_label: Switch to relative references")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/s390/Kconfig
index a45583f731f0,12dc4c1af96c..000000000000
--- a/arch/s390/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/s390/Kconfig
@@@ -126,7 -120,7 +126,8 @@@ config S39
select HAVE_ALIGNED_STRUCT_PAGE if SLUB
select HAVE_ARCH_AUDITSYSCALL
select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL
+ select HAVE_ARCH_JUMP_LABEL_RELATIVE
+ select HAVE_ARCH_KASAN
select CPU_NO_EFFICIENT_FFS if !HAVE_MARCH_Z9_109_FEATURES
select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER
select HAVE_ARCH_SOFT_DIRTY
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists