linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/36] dt-bindings: arm: Convert PMU binding to json-schema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqLeG3WUa2peOWFGUoMuonWaWJoU-7A6d8cqXp-_e3B3XA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 9 Oct 2018 13:14:02 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Grant Likely <glikely@...retlab.ca>,
        Kumar Gala <kumar.gala@...aro.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Tom Rini <trini@...sulko.com>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/36] dt-bindings: arm: Convert PMU binding to json-schema

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 6:57 AM Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob,
>
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 11:58:25AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Convert ARM PMU binding to DT schema format using json-schema.
> >
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt | 70 --------------
> >  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml          | 96 +++++++++++++++++++
> >  2 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> >  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.txt
> >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/pmu.yaml
>
> [...]
>
> > -- interrupts : 1 combined interrupt or 1 per core. If the interrupt is a per-cpu
> > -               interrupt (PPI) then 1 interrupt should be specified.
>
> [...]
>
> > +  interrupts:
> > +    oneOf:
> > +      - maxItems: 1
> > +      - minItems: 2
> > +        maxItems: 8
> > +        description: 1 interrupt per core.
> > +
> > +  interrupts-extended:
> > +    $ref: '#/properties/interrupts'
>
> This seems like a semantic different between the two representations, or am
> I missing something here? Specifically, both the introduction of
> interrupts-extended and also dropping any mention of using a single per-cpu
> interrupt (the single combined case is no longer support by Linux; not sure
> if you want to keep it in the binding).

'interrupts-extended' was implied before as it is always supported and
outside the scope of the binding. But now it is needed to validate
bindings. There must be some use of it and that's why I added it.
However, thinking some more about this, I think it may be better to
have the tools add this in automatically whenever we have an
interrupts property.

I guess the single interrupt case is less obvious now with no
description (it's the first list item of 'oneOf'). The schema If the
single interrupt is not supported, then we can drop it here.

Rob