[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153919094779.119890.4753836996500844280@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 10:02:27 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
evgreen@...omium.org, Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpio: Assign gpio_irq_chip::parents to non-stack pointer
Quoting Linus Walleij (2018-10-10 05:05:18)
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 6:32 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > Let's leave around one unsigned int in the gpio_irq_chip struct for the
> > single parent irq case and repoint the 'parents' array at it. This way
> > code is left mostly intact to setup parents and we waste an extra few
> > bytes per structure of which there should be only a handful in a system.
> >
> > Cc: Evan Green <evgreen@...omium.org>
> > Cc: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> > Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> > Fixes: e0d897289813 ("gpio: Implement tighter IRQ chip integration")
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
>
> OMG critical fix. I fixed up the thing the kbuild robot was complaining
> about with some vanilla kerneldoc and applied for fixes since it's kind
> of urgent.
>
> Please check the result.
>
Looks good. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists