[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38596780-30f7-0763-0c17-7517dbf0bf59@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 10:37:25 +0000
From: Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@....com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
CC: nd <nd@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-api@...r.kernel.org" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@...com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Chris Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Ben Maurer <bmaurer@...com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joelaf@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Carlos O'Donell <carlos@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Joseph Myers <joseph@...esourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for 4.21 01/16] rseq/selftests: Add reference counter
to coexist with glibc
On 10/10/18 20:19, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> In order to integrate rseq into user-space applications, add a reference
> counter field after the struct rseq TLS ABI so many rseq users can be
> linked into the same application (e.g. librseq and glibc). The
> reference count ensures that rseq syscall registration/unregistration
> happens only for the most early/late user for each thread, thus ensuring
> that rseq is registered across the lifetime of all rseq users for a
> given thread.
...
> +__attribute__((visibility("hidden"))) __thread
> +volatile struct libc_rseq __lib_rseq_abi = {
...
> +extern __attribute__((weak, alias("__lib_rseq_abi"))) __thread
> +volatile struct rseq __rseq_abi;
...
> @@ -70,7 +86,7 @@ int rseq_register_current_thread(void)
> sigset_t oldset;
>
> signal_off_save(&oldset);
> - if (refcount++)
> + if (__lib_rseq_abi.refcount++)
> goto end;
> rc = sys_rseq(&__rseq_abi, sizeof(struct rseq), 0, RSEQ_SIG);
why do you use a local refcounter instead of the __rseq_abi one?
what prevents calling rseq_register_current_thread more than 4G times?
why cant the kernel see that the same address is registered again and succeed?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists