[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bm80wcbj.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 21:46:56 +0300
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>, corbet@....net,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/completion.txt: Fix a couple of punctuation nits
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 08:29:10AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2018 at 10:56:32PM +0800, John Garry wrote:
>> > This patch fixes a couple of punctuation nits which can make the document
>> > more correct and readable.
>> >
>> > Also missing "()" are added to some function references for consistency.
>>
>> While there's nothing wrong here, any chance you want to try converting
>> it to .rst and adding it to the overall index? It looks a lot like
>> rst already.
>
> I, on principle, will not touch rst files. They are inferior to txt files.
$ git shortlog --author=Zijlstra -- Documentation/scheduler/
It does not look like you touch txt files either.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
Powered by blists - more mailing lists