linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: spi/spi-pxa2xx: add PXA2xx SSP SPI Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181012170002.GJ2340@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:00:02 +0200
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        James Cameron <quozl@...top.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: spi/spi-pxa2xx: add PXA2xx SSP SPI
 Controller

On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 07:59:15PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 15:27 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This
> > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.

> Thanks for the response.

> I'm a little confused here. Why I chose this subject line is because I
> did this:

>   git log --no-merges Documentation/devicetree/bindings/

Try Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi instead :)

> to figure out what's the typical subject for the DT binding changes.

> I also believed that's the right way to get Rob Herring's and Mark
> Rutland's attention. Do the device tree binding documentation typically

There *is* some debate for the DT bindings unfortunately.

> go in with the associated drivers, or via their tree ("OPEN FIRMWARE
> AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" in MAINTIANERS)?

They usually go in with the drivers.  This one isn't so bad since it
does mention SPI, it's a worse problem when that's not present at all.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)