linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: spi/spi-pxa2xx: add PXA2xx SSP SPI Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181017193218.GA8853@bogus>
Date:   Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:32:18 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        James Cameron <quozl@...top.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
        Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
        Daniel Mack <daniel@...que.org>,
        Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] dt-bindings: spi/spi-pxa2xx: add PXA2xx SSP SPI
 Controller

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 07:00:02PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 07:59:15PM +0200, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-10-11 at 15:27 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > Please use subject lines matching the style for the subsystem.  This
> > > makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches.
> 
> > Thanks for the response.
> 
> > I'm a little confused here. Why I chose this subject line is because I
> > did this:
> 
> >   git log --no-merges Documentation/devicetree/bindings/
> 
> Try Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi instead :)

Just so you know, pretty much everything else except SPI, regulators, 
and ASoC follows 'dt-bindings: <binding dir>:' these days.

I don't really care so much about the difference, but it is tribal 
knowledge that submitters have to learn. 

Really, this could all be solved with tooling using MAINTAINERS and 
get_maintainers.pl, but limping around in checkpatch.pl occasionally is 
enough perl for me.

> > to figure out what's the typical subject for the DT binding changes.
> 
> > I also believed that's the right way to get Rob Herring's and Mark
> > Rutland's attention. 

All that matters is CC'ing the DT list really. And Mark R is pretty much
AWOL. Reviewing bindings in front of your own will get yours reviewed 
faster. :)

> Do the device tree binding documentation typically
> 
> There *is* some debate for the DT bindings unfortunately.
> 
> > go in with the associated drivers, or via their tree ("OPEN FIRMWARE
> > AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" in MAINTIANERS)?
> 
> They usually go in with the drivers.  This one isn't so bad since it
> does mention SPI, it's a worse problem when that's not present at all.

Right.

I generally only take single patches not in a series with dts or driver 
changes and when/if the subsystem maintainer doesn't pick them up. Or 
any standalone fixes I'll take.

Rob