linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwms in example

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181012193126.GA26994@bogus>
Date:   Fri, 12 Oct 2018 14:31:26 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Cc:     robh@...nel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sebastian.reichel@...labora.co.uk,
        mark.rutland@....com, masneyb@...tation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: input: pwm-vibrator: correct pwms in
 example

On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 20:48:58 -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin,
> and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwms on the vibrator node has these two
> values swapped so this patch corrects it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - Swapped the pwms values instead of the pwm-names values since enable
>   is required and direction is optional. Based on feedback from
>   Rob Herring.
> 
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>