[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153973420806.5275.356235896596182005@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 16:56:48 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: ilia.lin@...il.com
Cc: Ilia Lin <ilialin@...eaurora.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 8/8] clk: qcom: Add ACD path to CPU clock driver for msm8996
Quoting ilia.lin@...il.com (2018-06-14 14:53:55)
> @@ -176,6 +183,9 @@ static struct clk_alpha_pll pwrcl_alt_pll = {
> },
> };
>
> +void __iomem *base;
> +static void qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_acd_init(void __iomem *base);
> +
Why are we doing this?
> @@ -393,6 +404,10 @@ qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_register_clks(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
> clk_alpha_pll_configure(&perfcl_alt_pll, regmap, &altpll_config);
> clk_alpha_pll_configure(&pwrcl_alt_pll, regmap, &altpll_config);
>
> + /* Enable alt PLLs */
> + clk_prepare_enable(pwrcl_alt_pll.clkr.hw.clk);
> + clk_prepare_enable(perfcl_alt_pll.clkr.hw.clk);
Are the alt PLLs CLK_IS_CRITICAL?
> +
> ret = clk_notifier_register(pwrcl_pmux.clkr.hw.clk, &pwrcl_pmux.nb);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> @@ -402,10 +417,48 @@ qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_register_clks(struct device *dev, struct regmap *regmap)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +#define CPU_AFINITY_MASK 0xFFF
> +#define PWRCL_CPU_REG_MASK 0x3
> +#define PERFCL_CPU_REG_MASK 0x103
> +
> +#define L2ACDCR_REG 0x580ULL
> +#define L2ACDTD_REG 0x581ULL
> +#define L2ACDDVMRC_REG 0x584ULL
> +#define L2ACDSSCR_REG 0x589ULL
> +
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(acd_lock);
> +
> +static void qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_acd_init(void __iomem *base)
> +{
> + u64 hwid;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&acd_lock, flags);
> +
> + hwid = read_cpuid_mpidr() & CPU_AFINITY_MASK;
> +
> + kryo_l2_set_indirect_reg(L2ACDTD_REG, 0x00006A11);
> + kryo_l2_set_indirect_reg(L2ACDDVMRC_REG, 0x000E0F0F);
> + kryo_l2_set_indirect_reg(L2ACDSSCR_REG, 0x00000601);
> +
> + if (PWRCL_CPU_REG_MASK == (hwid | PWRCL_CPU_REG_MASK)) {
> + writel(0xF, base + PWRCL_REG_OFFSET + SSSCTL_OFFSET);
> + wmb();
> + kryo_l2_set_indirect_reg(L2ACDCR_REG, 0x002C5FFD);
> + }
> +
> + if (PERFCL_CPU_REG_MASK == (hwid | PERFCL_CPU_REG_MASK)) {
> + kryo_l2_set_indirect_reg(L2ACDCR_REG, 0x002C5FFD);
> + writel(0xF, base + PERFCL_REG_OFFSET + SSSCTL_OFFSET);
> + wmb();
Please add comments to the barriers here so we know what they're doing.
I guess the first one is ordering writel with the indirect register
access, but the other one I don't know what it's doing.
> + }
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&acd_lock, flags);
> +}
> +
> static int qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret;
> - void __iomem *base;
Ok but still, why?
> struct resource *res;
> struct regmap *regmap;
> struct clk_hw_onecell_data *data;
> @@ -429,6 +482,8 @@ static int qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_driver_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + qcom_cpu_clk_msm8996_acd_init(base);
> +
> data->hws[0] = &pwrcl_pmux.clkr.hw;
> data->hws[1] = &perfcl_pmux.clkr.hw;
> data->num = 2;
> --
> 2.11.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists