[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <153965116919.5275.18169434559839796065@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2018 17:52:49 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
david.brown@...aro.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, robh+dt@...nel.org, thierry.reding@...il.com
Cc: masneyb@...tation.org, jonathan@...ek.ca, ctatlor97@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] treewide: add vibrator support for various MSM SOCs
Quoting Brian Masney (2018-09-26 16:51:09)
> This patch set adds support for the vibrator found on various Qualcomm
> MSM SOCs. This is based on work from:
Can you please stop adding 'treewide:' to your cover letters? It is very
confusing while reading over subject summaries to see something that
isn't actually treewide end up being qcom specific.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists