linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCHv2 2/4] printk: move printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181016072719.GB4030@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:27:19 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Daniel Wang <wonderfly@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Alan Cox <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv2 2/4] printk: move printk_safe macros to printk
 header

On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 02:04:26PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Make printk_safe_enter_irqsave()/etc macros available to the
> rest of the kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/printk.h      | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/printk/internal.h    | 37 ----------------------------------
>  kernel/printk/printk_safe.c |  6 ++++--
>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/printk.h b/include/linux/printk.h
> index cf3eccfe1543..75f99441fd54 100644
> --- a/include/linux/printk.h
> +++ b/include/linux/printk.h
> @@ -157,6 +157,46 @@ static inline void printk_nmi_direct_enter(void) { }
>  static inline void printk_nmi_direct_exit(void) { }
>  #endif /* PRINTK_NMI */
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PRINTK
> +extern void printk_safe_enter(void);
> +extern void printk_safe_exit(void);
> +
> +#define printk_safe_enter_irqsave(flags)	\
> +	do {					\
> +		local_irq_save(flags);		\
> +		printk_safe_enter();		\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags)	\
> +	do {					\
> +		printk_safe_exit();		\
> +		local_irq_restore(flags);	\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define printk_safe_enter_irq()		\
> +	do {					\
> +		local_irq_disable();		\
> +		printk_safe_enter();		\
> +	} while (0)
> +
> +#define printk_safe_exit_irq()			\
> +	do {					\
> +		printk_safe_exit();		\
> +		local_irq_enable();		\
> +	} while (0)

So I really _really_ hate all this. Utterly detest it.

That whole magic 'safe' printk buffer crap is just that crap.

Instead of this tinkering around the edges, why don't you make the main
logbuf a lockless ringbuffer and then delegate the actual printing of
that buffer to a kthread, except for earlycon, which can do synchronous
output.