[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZddvkgL1qwO=35y_Jps0+=QD3nPKQwgMEH+zcCH2NPdg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:35:10 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] device property: Introducing software nodes
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:39 PM Heikki Krogerus
<heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> To continue the discussion started by Dmitry [1], this is my proposal
> that I mentioned in my last mail. In short, the idea is that instead
> of trying to extend the support for the currently used struct
> property_set, I'm proposing that we introduce a completely new,
> independent type of fwnode, and replace the struct property_set with
> it. I'm calling the type "software node" here.
I'm a big fan of this approach.
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
for all patches.
I don't know who can finally review and merge this though,
I guess Rafael?
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists