[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h3uENUqbcb=0HH1wT_0MYQzcHct2d19tiarvXEdRay+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:36:33 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] device property: Introducing software nodes
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 9:35 AM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 1:39 PM Heikki Krogerus
> <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > To continue the discussion started by Dmitry [1], this is my proposal
> > that I mentioned in my last mail. In short, the idea is that instead
> > of trying to extend the support for the currently used struct
> > property_set, I'm proposing that we introduce a completely new,
> > independent type of fwnode, and replace the struct property_set with
> > it. I'm calling the type "software node" here.
>
> I'm a big fan of this approach.
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> for all patches.
>
> I don't know who can finally review and merge this though,
> I guess Rafael?
Yes, that would be me. :-)
I no one speaks up against them, I'll pick them up.
Cheers,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists